WINNING MAY NO LONGER REQUIRE DEFEATING AN OPPONENT
Boxing traditionalists challenge controversial changes to the rules

The world of heavyweight argument boxing has been thrown into turmoil following proposals to change the rules governing victory.
The controversy began when a contestant entered the ring carrying a hamburger and a can of diesel, spilled the fuel, lost his footing and declared victory while his opponent remained standing.
The Heavyweight Argument Standards Committee subsequently ruled that contestants were entitled to declare victory at any stage of a contest, regardless of the referee's decision.
Traditionalists have condemned the ruling, warning that it undermines the fundamental principle that one boxer should defeat the other.
Reformers argue that the existing rules discriminate against contestants who are losing but nevertheless believe they have won.
A proposal to prohibit contestants from bringing their own fuel into the ring was rejected after officials discovered that the rulebook contained no specific reference to diesel.
The contestant's representatives have argued that the spilled fuel is now part of the ring and therefore available to both competitors.
Officials are considering whether this satisfies the requirement for a level playing field.
The committee also considered whether competitors should be required to remain standing when declaring victory.
The amendment was defeated after members pointed out that it could prevent a boxer lying on the canvas from expressing his opinion.
A further proposal would allow contestants to challenge a referee's decision on the grounds that they had already announced the result.
Traditionalists have warned that the changes could lead to both contestants claiming victory simultaneously.
The committee said this would not necessarily be a problem. “Being correct has never been an explicit condition of declaring victory.”
The outcome of the original contest remains under review.
The contestant's declaration of victory does not.




